Phantoms and inflammations: reflections on the intersections between therapeutics and religion in India

https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2018.1570

Published 24 July 2018 Open Access


Serena Bindi Doctora en Antropología Social y Etnología. Profesora asociada, Université Paris Descartes, Francia. image/svg+xml



Abstract views
837
Metrics Loading ...

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Keywords:

Religion, Therapeutics, India

Abstract


This article looks at the presence and key role of nonhuman beings endowed with intention in the diagnosis and cure of illness. Based on the framework of studies of pluralism and itineraries of healing, the article reflects on the persistence of the category of the phantom – a nonhuman entity endowed with intentionality – in such paths of curation, alongside biomedicine and its diagnostic categories. The data upon which this article is based were collected over the course of numerous ethnographic field visits carried out between 2005 and 2015 in a network of villages located in the Garhwal region of the Uttarkashi district, in the area northwest of Uttarkhand, India. Using these data, the article attempts to reflect on the reasons why patients, in certain contexts throughout the diagnosis and healing process, seek out different specialists, often at the same time.


References


1. Naraindas H, Quack J, Sax WS, editors. Asymmetrical conversations: contestations, circumventions, and the blurring of therapeutic boundaries. Oxford: Berghahn; 2014.

2. Grmek M, editor. Histoire de la pensée médicale en Occident: Tome 1 Antiquité et Moyen Âge. Paris: Seuil; 1995.

3. Good B. Medicine, rationality, and experience: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

4. Forster GM, Anderson BG. Medical Anthropology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.

5. Benoist J, editor. Soigner au pluriel: Essais sur le pluralisme médical. Paris: Karthala; 1996.

6. Johanessen H, Lázár I. Multiple medical realities: Patients and healers in biomedical, alternative and traditional medicine. New York: Berghahn; 2006.

7. Orr D, Bindi S. Medical pluralism and global mental health. En: White RG, Jain S, Orr DMR, Read U, editors. The Palgrave handbook of global mental health: Socio-cultural perspectives. London: Palgrave-Macmillan; 2007.

8. Bindi S. La fabrique de l’événement: Paysage de possession, de soin et de production de sens dans la vallée du Baghirati (Garhwal, Inde du Nord). [Thèse Ethnologie]. Paris: EHESS, Università di Siena; 2009.

9. Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.

10. Weiss M, Doongaji D, Siddhartha S, Wypij D, Pathare S, Bhatawdekar M, Fernandes R. The explanatory model interview catalogue (emic): Contribution to cross-cultural research methods. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1992;160(1):819-830.

11. Dein S. Explanatory models and oversystematisation in medical anthropology. En: Littlewood R, editor. The importance of knowing about not knowing. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2007. p. 39-53.

12. Young A. When rational men fall sick: An inquiry into some assumptions made by medical anthropologists. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry. 1981;5(4):317-335.

13. Halliburton M. Mudpacks and Prozac: Experiencing ayurvedic, biomedical and religious healing. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2009.

14. Bibeau G, Corin E, Collignon R. Préface. En: Janzen JM. La quête de la thérapie au Bas-Zaïre. Paris: Karthala; 1995.

15. Fainzang S. Les stratégies paradoxales: Réflexions sur la question de l’incohérence des conduites des malades. Sciences Sociales et Santé. 1997;15(3):5-23.

16. Bourdieu P. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique: Précédé de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle. Genève: Droz; 1972.

17. Holland D, Lachichotte W, Skinner D, Cain C. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1998.

18. Bindi S. Grandir aujourd’hui en Himalaya Indien: Des rituels au service d’une nouvelle adolescence. Ethnologie Française. 2015(154):715-724.

19. Polit K. Women of honour: Gender and agency among Dalit women in the Central Himalayas. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan; 2012.

20. Fainzang S. L’intérieur des choses: Maladie, divination et reproduction sociale chez les Bisa du Burkina. Paris: L’Harmattan; 1986.

21. Turner V. The anthropology of performance. New York: Paj Publication; 1986.

22. Nabokov I. Religion against the self: An ethnography of Tamil rituals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

23. Obeyesekere G. Psycho-cultural exegesis of a case of spirit possession from Sri Lanka. Contributions to Asian Studies. 1975;(8):44-89.

24. Ram K. Fertile disorder: Spirit possession and its provocation of the modern. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 2013.

25. Lewis IM. Ecstatic religion: An anthropological study of spirit possession and shamanism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1971.

26. Leslie J. The perfect wife: The orthodox Hindu woman according to the Stridharmapaddhati of Tryambakayajvan. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1989.

27. Sax WS. Mountain goddess: Gender and politics in a Himalayan pilgrimage. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.

28. Krengel M. Communication and gift exchange between wife-givers and wife-takers in Kumaon Himalaya. En: Joshi MP, Fanger AC, Brown C, editors. Himalaya: past and present. Almora: Shree Almora Book Depot; 1991. p. 267-286.

29. Freed S, Freed R. Spirit possession as illness in a North Indian village. Ethnology. 1964(3):152-171.

30. Harper EB. Spirit possession and social structure. En: Ratnam B, editor. Anthropology on the March. Madras: The Book Centre; 1963.

31. Stirrat R. Power and religiosity in a post-colonial setting: Sinhala Catholics in contemporary Sri Lanka. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

32. Fassin D. Pouvoir et maladie en Afrique. Paris: PUF; 1992.