Institutions and their critics, or the habit of polarizing reality: the case of influenza A (H1N1)

https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2014.206

Published 4 April 2014 Open Access


Eduardo Menéndez Doctor en Ciencias Antropológicas. Profesor e investigador del Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS), México. Coordinador del Seminario Permanente de Antropología Médica (SPAM).




Abstract views
609
Metrics Loading ...



Keywords:

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Press, Scientific Communication and Diffusion, International Agencies, National Strategies, National Health Systems, Mexico


Abstract


The declaration of the influenza A (H1N1) epidemic in late April 2009 in Mexico was followed by a series of criticisms and to a lesser degree shows of support of the measures applied and of the manner of operation of the Mexican health system. In this text, I attempt to explain, using materials published in medical journals and in the Mexican press, the technical and ideological assumptions behind the work undertaken by the health sector as well as the assumptions behind the criticisms received. This exploration has two complementary objectives: first, to understand why the Mexican health sector acted the way it did; and second, to consider the technical legitimacy of the actions developed by the health sector and of the criticisms made regarding those actions.