The main premise of this paper is that common social discourse, manifested in the Arts & Humanities, has played a crucial role in the construction of technoscientific languages and cosmologies. I explore this argument in relation to recently established scientific disciplines, such as Epidemiology, through the lens of two works of cultural production: Saramago’s novel All the Names, and cult movie trilogy The Matrix, written and directed by the Wachowski Sisters. Both are allegories that exemplify a virtual world made possible by technoscience. A parallel is suggested between the first social observatories that encapsulated whole populations for systematic observation (allowing improvement of epidemiological methodology) and the “epidemiological dream” – nearly realized through the introduction of electronic data processing, enhanced by the advancement of modeling and simulation strategies and the organization of immense databases on health, disease, life, and death.
Keywords: Epidemiological Theory, Risk, Literature, Films
Categories: Epistemology
1. Diaz E. La posciencia: el conocimiento científico en las postrimerías de la modernidad. Buenos Aires: Biblos; 2007.
2. Castoriadis C. Science moderne et interrogation philosophique. En: Les Carrefours du Labyrinthe. Paris: Seuil; 1978.
3. Almeida Filho N, Castiel L, Ayres J. Riesgo: concepto básico de la epidemiología. Salud Colectiva. 2009;5(3):323-344. doi: 10.18294/sc.2009.238.
4. Gadamer G. The enigma of health. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1996.
5. Haraway D. Symians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge; 1991.
6. Almeida-Filho N. A clínica e a epidemiologia. Rio de Janeiro: APCE, Abrasco; 1992.
7. Almeida-Filho N. La ciencia tímida: Ensayos hacia la deconstrucción de la epidemiología. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial; 2000.
8. Sevalho G. O “homem dos riscos” e o “homem lento” e a teorização sobre o risco epidemiológico em tempos de globalização. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação. 2012;16(40):7-19. doi: 10.1590/S1414-32832012005000005.
9. Portella SL, Oliveira SS, Valencio N, Nunes JA. Da “ponte sobre águas turbulentas” à reinvenção do “homem lento”: reflexões sobre assimetrias de saber e desastres. Revista Ciência & Trópico. 2016;37(1):1-22.
10. Boutang YM. Cognitive capitalism. London: Polity Press; 2011.
11. Chalmers A. What is this thing called Science? Londres: Open University Press; 1982.
12. Bhaskar R. Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso; 1986.
13. Saramago J. Todos os nomes. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras; 1997.
14. Almeida-Filho N. Saramago’s All the Names and the epidemiological dream. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004;58(9):743-746.
15. Houaiss A. Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Oliveira; 2001.
16. Rey A. Dictionnaire Historique de la Langue Française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert; 1993.
17. Horsley J. Matrix warrior: being the one. New York: Thomas Dunne Books; 2015.
18. Žižek S. The Matrix: The two sides of perversion [Internet]. 1999 [citado 15 oct 2019]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/tb68zxe.
19. Manzotti R. The computational stance is unfit for consciousness. International Journal of Machine Consciousness. 2012;4(2):401-420.
20. Hanley R. Reflexions on the First Matrix. En: Philosophy & The Matrix [Internet]. 2002 [citado 15 oct 2019]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/uux4mam.
21. Bostrom N. Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly. 2003;52(211):243-255.
22. Paura R. Living in the Matrix: How a scientific conjecture was turned into a conspiracy theory. Messages, Sages and Ages. 2017;4(2). doi: 10.1515/msas-2017-0006.
23. Atkin R. From Theseus to Daedalus: Saramago, Sr. José, and the reader in the labyrinth of Todos os Nomes. Portuguese Studies. 2007;23(2):191-207.
24. Irwin W, (ed.). The Matrix and philosophy: welcome to the desert of the real. New York: Open Court Publishing Company; 2002.
25. Partridge J. Plato’s Cave and the Matrix. En: Philosophy & The Matrix [Internet]. 2003 [citado 15 oct 2019]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/rz97suv.
26. Platón. La República. Madrid: Akal; 2009.
27. Saramago J. A caverna. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras; 2000.
28. Susser M. Epidemiology in the United States after World War II: The evolution of technique. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1985;7:147 177.
29. Greenwood M. Epidemiology: historical and experimental. London: Humphrey Millford; 1932.
30. Santos BS. Introdução a uma Ciência Pós-Moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Graal; 1989.
31. Latour B. Pandoras’s hope: Essays on the reality of sciences studies. Cambridge: Massachusetts, Harvard University Press; 1999.
32. Vineis P. Modelli di rischio: epidemiologia e causalitá. Torino: Einaudi; 1990.
33. Hayes M. On the epistemology of risk: language, logic and social science. Social Science and Medicine. 1992; 35(4):401-407.
34. Coutinho D, Almeida-Filho N, Castiel LD. Epistemologia da epidemiologia (categorias de determinação: causalidade, predição, contingência, sobredeterminação). En: Almeida-Filho N, Barreto M, (org.). Epidemiologia & saúde: fundamentos, métodos, aplicações. Río de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2011. p. 29-42.
35. Alexander J. The ideological construction of risk: an analysis of corporate health programs in the 1980s. Social Science and Medicine. 1988;26(5): 559-567.
36. Foucault M. Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines. París: Gallimard; 1966.
37. Marcuse H. One dimensional man. New York: Routledge; 1968.
38. Giannotti JA. Apresentação do Mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras; 1995.
39. Žižek S. Cogito in the History of Madness [Internet]. 2019 [citado 15 oct 2019]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/r8quxo3.
40. Bunge M. Method, model and matter. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company; 1973.
41. Castel R. La gestion des risques. Paris: Editions de Minuit; 1981.
42. Foucault M. La naissance de la clinique. Paris: Gallimard; 1963.