Hesitation towards the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: a digital ethnographic study

https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2024.4541

Published 26 March 2024 Open Access


Rosalynn Adeline Vega PhD in Medical Anthropology. Associate Professor, University of Texas Rio Grande Valle, Edinburg, USA.



Abstract views
200
Metrics Loading ...

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Keywords:

COVID-19 Vaccines, Child, Parents, Pediatricians, United States of America

Abstract


Following the authorization the use of COVID-19 vaccines in babies age six months through children four years old in the United States, some individuals (parents, pediatricians, and communicators) framed COVID-19 vaccination as an issue of access, while many others expressed hesitancy and some resisted recommendations from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In this context, this study aimed to explore: 1) divergent reactions to the authorization of COVID-19 vaccine use in children aged six months to four years; and 2) opposing logics underlying attitudes towards pro-vaccination, anti-vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines. To achieve this, a digital ethnography was conducted, involving monitoring of 5,700 reactions to a series of eight infographics published on social media by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and participant observation in an online focus group over a one-year period, from December 2021 to December 2022, consisting of 18 mothers. The findings suggest that healthcare professionals should consider different notions of “risk” when interacting with patients, especially those who are hesitant to vaccinate.


References


1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Actualización sobre el coronavirus (COVID-19): La FDA autoriza las vacunas contra el COVID-19 de Moderna y Pfizer-BioNTech para niños a partir de los seis meses de edad [Internet]. 2022 [citado 10 mar 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3fj69u3u.

2. Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades. Los CDC recomiendan las vacunas contra el COVID-19 para los niños pequeños [Internet]. 2022 [citado 12 may 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/8natr27u.

3. Campoamor D. ‘Finally’: Parents react to FDA endorsing COVID vaccines for kids under 5. Today [Internet]. 2022 [citado 1 feb 2024]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/mvc3e3k5.

4. Food & Drug Administration. FDA Briefing Document: EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 6 months through 4 years of age [Internet]. 2022 [citado 10 mar 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/375nadjy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47287/cen-09931-buscon1

5. Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, et al. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Safety Among Children Aged 6 Months-5 years—United States, June 18, 2022-August 21, 2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71(35):1115-1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7135a3

6. John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. What do parents and caregivers need to know? [Internet]. 21 nov 2022 [citado 1 feb 2024]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/4u5df57y.

7. John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Why aren’t kids under 5 getting vaccinated for Covid? [Internet]. 21 nov 2022 [citado 1 feb 2024]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/dk3nrrpa.

8. Leach M, Fairhead J. Vaccine anxieties: Global science, child health, and society. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008.

9. Kashyap A, Shrivastava S, Krishnatray P. Vaccine hesitancy: The growing parent-provider divide. Asia Pacific Media Educator. 2020;29(2):259-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19895826

10. Vogel L. Forming trust with vaccine fence-sitters. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2016;188(12):857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5306

11. Roberts J, Mitchell LM. “It’s Your Body, Your Decision”: An Anthropology Exploration of HPV Vaccine Hesitancy. In: Paul Bramadat , Maryse Guay , Julie Bettinger and Rêal Roy, editors. Public Health in the Age of Anxiety. Berlin: Degruyter; 2017. p. 293-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487510404-012

12. Larson H, Broniatowski D. Volatility of vaccine confidence. Science. 2021;371(6536): 1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6488

13. Charles N. Suspicion: Vaccines, hesitancy, and the affective politics of protection in Barbados. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478022251

14. Rozbroj T, Lyons A, Lucke J. Vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-refusing parents’ reflections on the way parenthood changed their attitudes to vaccination. Journal of Community Health. 2019;45:63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00723-9

15. Dubé E, Vivion M, Sauvageau C, Gagneur A, Gagnon R, Guay M. “Nature does things well, why should we interfere?”: Vaccine hesitancy among mothers. Qualitative Health Research. 2016;26(3):411-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573207

16. Kadono M. ‘It’s been a huge stress’: An in-depth, exploratory study of vaccine hesitant parents in Southern California. Ann Arbor: Proquest, 2020.

17. Williams JTB, O’Leary ST. To EHB 1638 or not to EHB 1638? For immunization policymakers, that is the question. American Journal of Public Health. 2023;113:718-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307318

18. Naciones Unidas. Conoce las diez principales amenazas contra la salud mundial [Internet]. 2019 [citado 10 may 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/784mp384.

19. Hine C. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage; 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277

20. English-Leuck JA. Cultures@SiliconValley. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press; 2002.

21. Taylor TL. Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5418.001.0001

22. Biao X. Global “Body Shopping”: An Indian Labor System in the Information Technology Industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.

23. Baron NS. Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.003.0002

24. Boellstorff T. Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.

25. Senft T. Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks. New York: Peter Lang; 2008.

26. Juris JS. Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham: Duke University Press; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn2g6

27. Malaby T. Making virtual worlds: Linden lab and second life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801458996

28. Hine C. Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances. In: Blank G, Fielding N, Lee RM, eds. The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n14

29. Augé M. Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso, 1995.

30. Gupta A, Ferguson J. Discipline and practice: ‘the field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology. In: Gupta A, Ferguson J, eds. Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997. p. 1-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5973134.4

31. Ingold T. Perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London: Routledge; 2000.

32. Airoldi M. Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2018;21(6):661-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622

33. Postill J. Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia. 2012;145(1):123-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114

34. Caliandro A. Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2017;47(5):551-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617702960

35. Lee RM. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.

36. Steinmetz KF. Message received: virtual ethnography in online message boards. International Journal for Qualitative Methodology. 2012;11(1)26-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100103

37. Burrell J. The field site as a network: a strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods. 2009;21(2):181-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699

38. Wesch M. Web 2.0…the machine is us/ing us [Video] 2007 [citado 10 mar 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/yckh4jmr.

39. Boellstorff T, Nardi B, Pearce C, Taylor TL. Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.cttq9s20

40. Ess C, AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommenations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee [Internet]. 2002 [citado 10 mar 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/mrykhmeu.

41. Sobo EJ. Theorizing (vaccine) refusal: Through the looking glass. Cultural Anthropology. 2016;13(3):342-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.04

42. Sorrell T, Butler J. The politics of Covid vaccine hesitancy and opposition. The Political Quarterly. 2022;93(2):347-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13134

43. Goldberg MJ. Vaccine Hesitancy: Public trust, expertise, and the war on science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ghv4s4

44. Chowdhury SH, Mithila TT, Tolchard B. Anthropological commentary on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a Bangladesh perspective. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2023;10(6):2272-2277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20231715

45. Leask J, Kinnersley P, Jackson C, Cheater F, Bedford H, Rowles G. Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals. BMC Pediatrics. 2012;12:154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-154

46. Quinn SC, Andrasik MP. Addressing vaccine hesitancy in BIPOC communities—Toward trustworthiness, partnership, and reciprocity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(2):97-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2103104

47. Richlin JB. From iatrogenesis to vaccine skepticism: US mothers’ negative vaccine perceptions and non-vaccination practices as reverberations of medical harm. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2023;37(2):118-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12764

48. Kasstan B. Vaccines and vitriol: an anthropological commentary on vaccine hesitancy, decision-making and interventionism among religious minorities. Anthropology & Medicine. 2021;28(4):411-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2020.1825618

49. Majid U, Ahmad M. The factors that promote vaccine hesitancy, rejection, or delay in parents. Qualitative Health Research. 2020;30(11):1762-1776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320933863

50. Siu JYM, Fung TKF, Leung LH. Social and cultural construction processes involved in HPV vaccine hesitancy among Chinese women: a qualitative study. International Journal for Health Equity. 2019;18(1):147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1052-9

51. Grodzicka ED. Taking vaccine regret and hesitancy seriously: The role of truth, conspiracy theories, gender relations, and trust in the HPV immunization programmes in Ireland. Journal for Cultural Research. 2021;25(1):69-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2021.1886422

52. Hastrup K. Getting it right: Knowledge and evidence in anthropology. Anthropological Theory. 2004;4(4):455-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499604047921

53. Ramirez K, Mackey S. How do multigenerational households deal with vaccine hesitant members? [Undergraduate degree]. California: The California State University; 2023.

54. Sobo EJ, Huhn A, Sannwald A, Thurman L. Information curation among vaccine cautious parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest thinking, and pediatric vaccination choice. Medical Anthropology. 2016;35(6):529-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2016.1145219

55. Ofri D. The emotional epidemiology of H1N1 influenza vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361:2594-2595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0911047

56. Brunson EK, Sobo EJ. Framing childhood vaccination in the United States: Getting past polarization in the public discourse. Human Organization. 2017;76(1):38-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259.76.1.38

57. Brunk C. The role of risk perception in vaccine hesitancy and the challenge of communication. In: Bramadat P, Guay M, Bettinger J, Roy R, eds. Public health in the age of anxiety. Berlin: Degruyter; 2017. p. 80-108.

58. Anderson-Chavarria M, Turner J. Searching for the “Trigger’: An ethnographic analysis of parental beliefs regarding autism causation and vaccination in Puerto Rico. Vaccine. 2023;41(2):540-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.064

59. Gerend MA, Magloire ZF. Awareness, knowledge, and beliefs about human papillomavirus in a racially diverse sample of young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2008;42(3):237-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.022

60. Allen JD, Mohllajee AP, Shelton RC, Othus MKD, Fontenot HB, Hanna R. Stage of adoption of the human papillomavirus vaccine among college women. Preventive Medicine. 2009;48(5):420-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.005

61. Caron RM, Kispert E, McGrath RJ. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: Attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs of at-risk women. Internet Journal of Health. 2008;9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/184b

62. Ward PR, Atwell K, Meyer SB, Rokkas P, Leask J. Understanding the perceived logic of care by vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-refusing parents: A qualitative study in Australia. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185955