Full-text of the article is available for this language: Español.
Within moral and legal philosophy, this essay critically examines the concept of dignity in the debate on euthanasia, starting from its intrinsically ambiguous and contested character. Through a conceptual and historical analysis, it argues that “dignity” is not a univocal concept, but rather one marked by ongoing disputes about its meaning, allowing for multiple conceptions with divergent normative implications. The text reconstructs relevant philosophical traditions, from Cicero to Kant and Waldron, in order to situate the relationship between dignity and autonomy as its central argumentative axis, recovering the latter as one of its most plausible foundations. On this basis, the essay contends that paternalistic interventions that restrict individual decisions in the name of dignity are conceptually problematic. Accordingly, a conception of dignity grounded in autonomy provides a normative basis for euthanasia, understood as the expression of an autonomous decision regarding one’s own death.
Keywords: Euthanasia, Right to Die, Dignity, Autonomy
Categories: Bioethics
Full-text of the article is available for this language: Español.
1. Koselleck R. Futures Past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press; 2004.
2. Milbank J. Dignity rather tan rights. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
3. Gallie WB. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1955;56:167-198.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
4. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1999.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
5. Waldron J. Dignity, rank and rights. London: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
6. Debes R. Dignity. In: Stanford Encyclopedya of Philosophy [Internet]. 2023 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/dstykh4n
7. Rosen M. Dignity: The case against. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
8. Tasioulas J. Human dignity and the foundations of human rights. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
9. Beitz CR. Human dignity in the theory of human rights: Nothing but a phrase? Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2013;41(3): 259-290.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
10. FitzPatrick W. Dignity/Worth. In: LaFollette H, (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.; 2024.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
11. Schopenhauer A. On the basis of morality. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company; 1995.
12. Macklin R. Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ. 2003;327(7429): 1419-1420.
Crossref
| PubMed
| Google Scholar
13. Pinker S. The stupidity of dignity [Internet]. The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science; 2008 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3yzyzvf8
14. Schlinck B. The concept of human dignity. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
15. Nietzsche F. The Greek State. In: Strong TB. Nietzsche and Politics. Farnham: Ashgate; 2009.
16. Mahlmann M. Six antidotes to dignity fatigue in ethics and law. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
17. Grimm D. Dignity in a legal context: dignity as an absolute right. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
18. Rosen M. Dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2012.
19. Debes R. Dignity: A history. London: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
20. Cicero. On Duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
21. Pufendorf S. The whole duty of man according to the law of nature. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund; 2003.
22. Waldron J. Citizenship and dignity. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
23. Pico della Mirandola G. On the dignity of man, Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company; 1965.
24. Kateb G. Human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2011.
25. Kant I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge Cambridge: University Press; 1997.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
26. Mill JS. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1971.
27. Bird C. Dignity as a moral concept. Social Philosophy and Policy. 2013;30(1-2):150-176.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
28. Kant I. Lectures on ethics. Indianapoilis: Hacket Publishing Company; 1963.
29. Hill Jr TE. In defense of human dignity: Comments on Kant and Rosen. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
30. Kant I. The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
31. León XIII. Encíclica “Quod Apostolici Muneris” [Internet]. 28 dic 1878 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/436b8wbv
32. Brownsword R. Human dignity, human rights, and simply trying to do the right thing. In: McCrudden C, (ed.). Understanding human dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
33. Etinson A. What’s so special about human dignity. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2020;48(4):353-381.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
34. Feinberg J. The nature and value of rights. In: Rights, justice, and the bounds of Liberty. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1980.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
35. Killmister S. Contours of dignity. London: Oxford University Press; 2020.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
36. Naciones Unidas. Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos [Internet]. 1948 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2bwyzd4j
37. Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. Law for the Federal Republic of Germany [Internet]. 1949 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/mrx263c9
38. Conferencia sobre la Seguridad y la Cooperación en Europa. Acta final [Internet]. Helsinki; 1975 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2vu8ywmh
39. Naciones Unidas. Convenio de Ginebra relativo a la protección debida a las personas civiles en tiempo de guerra [Internet]. 1949 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/9av5ryrx
40. Hobbes T. Leviatán: o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil. Buenos Aires Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2021.
41. Darwall S. Equal dignity and rights. In: Debes R. Dignity: A history. London: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
42. Sensen O. Dignity: Kant´s revolutionary conception. In: Debes R. Dignity: A history. London: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
43. Darwall SL. Two kinds of respect. Ethics. 1977;88(1):36-49.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
44. Taylor C. Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
45. Lee P, George RP. The nature and basis of human dignity. Ratio Juris. 2008;21(2):173-193.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
46. Railton P. Naturalistic realism in metaethics. In: McPherson T, Plunkett D, (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge; 2018.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
47. Sturgeon NL. Ethical naturalism. In: Copp D, (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. London: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
48. Dancy J. Nonnaturalism. In: Copp D, (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. London: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Crossref
| Google Scholar
49. Moore GE. Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
50. Real Academia Español. Estatus [Internet]. 2025 [citado 10 may 2025]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/4bp43buj
51. Simester AP. Enforcing morality. In: Marmor A, (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York: Routledge; 2012.
52. Mill JS. On liberty. Ontario: Batoche Books; 2001.